"Burning a Book will invite terrorist attacks on Americans" | "Dressing provocatively encourages rape"
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Difference?
Labels:
Analogies,
Communalism,
Ethics,
Freedom of expression,
Hypocrisy,
Islam,
Mass media,
Political correctness,
Protests,
Quran,
Religion,
Short post,
Terrorism,
violence,
Why world is doomed
8 comments:
Well-articulated disagreement would be a very good indicator that I was understood, and would be appreciated more than perfunctory agreement or praise. But of course, you could agree and praise...
Important disclaimer: The views expressed in comments by visitors to this blog do not necessarily enjoy my endorsement. Though I believe, practically, the comments' space of this blog belongs entirely to the readers and that I must not regulate it, I might delete comments that are insulting to other people, or if they are of violent nature.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Updates from my new Blog
If you want to comment...
As you might know, I have shifted my blog to Wordpress - here (click).
All the blog posts I had published before shifting have been transferred there, so if you want to comment on any of the blog posts on this blog, SIMPLY CLICK ON THE TITLE OF THE INDIVIDUAL POSTS.
Thank you!
All the blog posts I had published before shifting have been transferred there, so if you want to comment on any of the blog posts on this blog, SIMPLY CLICK ON THE TITLE OF THE INDIVIDUAL POSTS.
Thank you!
2012
55 words be damned
55-er
55-Fiction
55er
Addiction
Adverse possession
affiliation
Allah
Allegory
ambition
Analogies
Anticlimax
Arrogance
Ashley Tellis
Atheism
Atlas Shrugged
Ayn Rand
Ayodhya dispute
Babri Mosque
Barkha Dutt
BJP
Blogger
Bloggers
Blogs
Bollywood
Brain
Bullosophy
Career
Challenge
Child sexual abuse
Christianity
Commonwealth games 2010
Communalism
Competition
Conformism
contentment
Corruption
Crappy technical words that just mean shit
Cynicism
Dark
Death
Deception
Democracy
Dreams
Efficiency
Ego
Embezzlement
English
Ethics
Ethics in Tangents
Evolution
Eyes
Falsifiability
Fantasy
Favorites
Fiction
Flash fiction
Force of habit
Free will
Freedom of expression
Future
Gail Waynand
Galileo
Gandhi family
Giordano Bruno
God
Guest post
Guilt
Gujarati
Heroes
Hindi
Hindu - the newspaper
History
Howard Roark
Humor
Hypocrisy
Hypothesis
idealism
illusion
Impulse
Inflation
Intelligence
Internet
IPC
Islam
Journalism
Judiciary
Language
Lateral thinking
Life
Lot of links
Love
Madhu Koda
Mail to blogger
Majority
Mass media
Medical crap--not for human consumption
Midas Mulligan
mirage
Mobile technology
Morality
Movies
Music
My blog
Narendra Modi
Natural selection
Naturalism
NDTV
NewsX
Nightmare
no atheists in foxholes
Nobel Prize
Obama
Obesity
Objectivism
Ophthalmology
Oxytocin
Parenting
Parody
pederasty
People
philosophy
Poetry
Political correctness
Politics
Poll
Populism
Practical objectivism
Practicality
Prejudice
Price rise
procrastination
Protests
Psychiatry
Psychology
Purpose of Life
Quran
Ram Gopal Varma
Rationality
Recommendations
Religion
Review
Rhyme
scarcity
Science
Secularism
Serendipity
Short post
Short story
Song parody
Story
Stubbornness
Supernaturalism
Survey
Survival of fittest
Technology
Terrorism
The Fountainhead
Tragedy
Trivia
Twitter
Un.atheism
UPA
violence
Weight
Why world is doomed
Widgets
Wikipedia
Here's one diff I could think of:
ReplyDeleteout-of-the-wayness
Dresses are meant to be worn (social convention)
Books are meant to be read (conventionally).
Sufficiency or coverage or nature of the dress is somewhat akin to the subject matter of the book.
Thus a nearly-equivalent analogy would be to posit a group of people that routinely and always does unconventional things to books.
group A:
They eat HarryPotter books. They wear pages out of Ramayana. They burn some other books.
People would find them oddo but burning books now looks okay by what they usually do.
group B:
They usually singe books. some of them char books sometimes. and some of them they burn books.
group B is really inline with your dress analogy.
thx,
Jai
excuses just excuses.
ReplyDeletethe same terrorists have attacked saudi arabia where Quran is revered. so even if usa doesn't burn !uran, if they want to attack, they will attack
more rapes occur in regions like afghanistan than sweden. so thats a myth which could be used as an excuse.
Hi Ketan
ReplyDeleteOne results in destruction. Other results in creation! Thats the only difference I can think of.
Looking at the words (invite vs encourages), the inference can as well be "guarantee" vs. "possibility".
Both are bad jokes, anyway.
Cheers
G Saimukundhan
Aaahh just lame these are. WD has said it all :-)
ReplyDeleteMuslims have burnt lot of books so its time kuran should be burned..
ReplyDeletedressing is complex
Roger Cohen in NYT:
ReplyDelete"..Heinrich Heine, the German poet, foresaw the worst early in the 19th century: “Where they burn books, in the end they will also burn people.”.."
Mapping to your analogy only gets it to:
"Where they wear provocative dresses, they will in the end not wear anything"
No harm done. difference. See?
thx,
Jai
A good comparison - and indeed one which should be looked at closely. They both have the same elements - namely is one responsible for one's own actions if one is "provoked" but not directly incited?
ReplyDeleteJust realized that the statements are bad excuses as well. Noticed that Wisedonkey had already pointed that out.
ReplyDeleteEven if considered an excuse, there is lot of conviction over the results of koran buring, than the effect of dressing provocatively.
Cheers
G Saimukundhan